tweetindex
EN

Richard Calland

@richardcalland · Cape Town, South Africa · joined 05 Jun 2012

Africa Director @cisl_cambridge Emeritus Prof., UCT Adjunct @wits_WSG. Gooner, Dad. Partner: The Paternoster Group. Debut play @markettheatre in 2024.

14 215Followers
2 625Following
8 885Posts total
11.7KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

@richardcalland Intriguing… not following the proceedings but seems I will have to! 134 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@richardcalland amaFLAW 250 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@richardcalland Should a president not be held to a higher standard. Tax laws, exchange control, private use of state resources…. 224 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@richardcalland My lay man ask is that is it possible he may escape scot free despite the money couch? 279 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Trengove SC, for the President, is now going through each of the four charges against Ramaphosa to show that the Panel failed to apply the ‘sufficient evidence’ and the ‘bad faith and intentionality’ tests properly or at all in some cases. 1.4K views · 24 likes · 5 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
And now, an argument that has been freshly mined by the president’s legal team since the original review application, and it’s a compelling one: the International Criminal Court has an almost identical three stage process: prima facie; sufficient evidence; full trial. 3.2K views · 27 likes · 11 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Trengove now draws attention to the fact that the impeachment process for chapter 9 bodies (used to remove a public protector) uses the prima facie test for the equivalent panel, and that parliament must have been deliberate in using a different test for the s.89 panel. 1K views · 13 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Judge Sher latches onto a point that is pleaded by the President but Trengove has not (yet) argued: that the Panel fails to distinguish between information and evidence - one of the flaws that stood out to me when I first read the panel report late on the night of 30 Nov 2022. 3K views · 41 likes · 10 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
My latest @Businessday column engages the growing debate about the role of Middle Powers in an era of predatory hegemonic great powers. https://t.co/rIvTeQjgWC 2.1K views · 11 likes · 8 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

9 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views1 005this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %7.07%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %1.10%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post1 0059241.09×
Reach (views ÷ followers)7.07%3.62%1.95×
Engagement rate1.10%1.52%0.72×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.1K2 Sep
3K
1K
3.2K
1.4K
279
224
250
134

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.10%2 Sep
1.77%
1.49%
1.30%
2.05%
0.36%
0.89%
0.40%
0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes63.7%116 in total
Reposts19.8%36 in total
Replies6.0%11 in total
Quotes2.2%4 in total
Bookmarks8.2%15 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts