Science Vs

@sciencevs · Brooklyn, NY · joined 22 Dec 2015

A podcast pitting facts against everything else.

22 849Followers

997Following

3 910Posts total

3KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

Science Vs@sciencevs17 Sep

People are saying AI is going rogue, and that it could wipe us out in the near future. But how exactly would this happen? We dive into the nitty gritty, apocalyptic details and find out how worried we should be about AI right now. https://t.co/Yq9HJ2Os0S 590 views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Science Vs@sciencevs10 Sep

🚨New ep alert! We have an AMAZING interview with Dr. Jessica Ware from the @AMNH! We find out what's actually going on with the insect world. But we ALSO find out ... why Jessica and other entomologists work with gold-plated dragonfly penises. 💅 https://t.co/u5YFaXlSjn 514 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Science Vs@sciencevs3 Sep

Has our protein obsession gone too far?? Tons of us are eating more protein than ever — but a recent paper suggests that LIMITING protein could actually help us live longer. So ... wtf? Is protein-maxxing bad? We do some science-maxxing to find out 👇 https://t.co/m5pBTLPNCn 579 views · 12 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Science Vs@sciencevs27 Aug

Could sunscreen be bad for us?? People online say that it’s toxic, that it messes with vitamin D, and even that it could actually INCREASE your risk of skin cancer. We slather on the science to find out what’s up with all this. https://t.co/Q9NM6W7sth 628 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Science Vs@sciencevs20 Aug

@hankgreen has spent nearly 20 years making science go viral. So what has he learned about the internet along the way? Today on Science Vs, we chat to Hank about algorithms, filter bubbles, the fight for our attention, oh & the time he peed out his cancer. https://t.co/iBD9NVun91 668 views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

5 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. below its peers on both reach and engagement.

Median views590this account924median for 10K–100K

Reach, %2.58%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %0.78%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	590	924	0.64×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	2.58%	3.62%	0.71×
Engagement rate	0.78%	1.52%	0.51×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

66820 Aug

62827 Aug

5793 Sep

51410 Sep

59017 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.75%20 Aug

0.32%27 Aug

2.25%3 Sep

0.78%10 Sep

1.02%17 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes80.0%24 in total

Reposts16.7%5 in total

Replies3.3%1 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.