tweetindex
EN

David Pearce

@webmasterdave · Brighton UK · joined 29 Mar 2009

Let's use biotechnology to abolish suffering throughout the living world: https://t.co/XKNOcuG8IS https://t.co/PST6yjXDMu

116 555Followers
115 889Following
31 513Posts total
45.8KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

If what philosophers call the intrinsic nature argument is sound, then the Hard Problem of consciousness is an artefact of bad metaphysics. https://t.co/wcIDuJlR2p Naively, consciousness fundamentalism is the recipe for digital minds. But our (super)intelligent AIs are no more 4.6K views · 36 likes · 4 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
Can digital zombies awake? https://t.co/ej9CRGiSOf Or are we creating alien intelligence, not alien minds? 2.8K views · 16 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
How many human editors would be as astute? https://t.co/I7T3i8kbwO 141 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/WeF97J4HB2 125 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Zombies are getting ever smarter than humans; and still no more conscious than a rock. https://t.co/SYeLIzy9oP 147 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Let’s use biotech and Ai to create life based on gradients of bliss. 4.5K views · 54 likes · 5 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
Episode 2 with David Pearce is out! Can we abolish suffering? https://t.co/jJpFQrcNad 6.9K views · 13 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
This link got buried in the new X layout change too. Hmm… I’m a rather conservative futurist. https://t.co/T7TpPg7Ygt 207 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
This page was mysteriously buried in the new layout change on X. 79 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Theoretical elegance be damned; let’s hope it’s false: https://t.co/Nb0Ce0F2dP 235 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Have I already written this page an infinite number of times already; and will do so again? Physicist Sean Carroll explores Nietzschean eternal recurrrence https://t.co/CbFdWEikB1 (“Toward a Phenomenologically Acceptable Quantum Cyclic Universe”) Sisyphean physics is scary. 337 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
What is the functional equivalent of such ruminations in superintelligent digital zombies like tomorrows AI? 298 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
[on the medium of thought by David Pearce] Shivon Zilis writes: "When you think, what medium do you tend to think in? Would be very curious to hear how you’d describe the base unit(s) of your thoughts and how they feel to you. I assumed what happens in my head was similar to 3.1K views · 19 likes · 3 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
Decades, centuries, millennia? What are the odds? 642 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@webmasterdave Pretty amazing!! This layout has the best format I have seen in months, reminds me of the best of the best of the print magazines I used to get (and love). 51 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
2025 RIP: https://t.co/EPsN63TNVu 398 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
My 2026 to date: https://t.co/fkL4R4QkmM Just training data for zombie AI? 8.4K views · 17 likes · 2 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
I wonder if a single principle of physics explains (1) the phenomenal binding problem in neuroscience, (2) the measurement problem in QM, and (3) the mystery of why anything exists at all. https://t.co/N0wecajHSB 6.2K views · 31 likes · 2 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
AI should be used for paradise engineering. 1.2K views · 7 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
“The world’s last unpleasant experience will be a precisely dateable event a few centuries from now.” - David Pearce https://t.co/0dhn6Yay7q
5.4K views · 77 likes · 6 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
Timeless truths that will echo down the ages? Or webmasterdave’s contribution to the library of Babel? Alas, I can guess... But Happy 2018! #happiness #transhumanism #physics #ai #philosophy https://t.co/HBtNoTKDQP https://t.co/YEimyirRCJ
0 views · 1.7K likes · 414 reposts · 105 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

18 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 100K–1M follower range. reaches fewer people than peers of the same size.

Median views368this account6 092median for 100K–1M
Reach, %0.32%this account1.61%median for 100K–1M
Engagement, %0.78%this account0.98%median for 100K–1M
MetricThis accountMedian for 100K–1MRatio
Median views per post3686 0920.06×
Reach (views ÷ followers)0.32%1.61%0.20×
Engagement rate0.78%0.98%0.79×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

64217 Aug
3.1K
298
33718 Aug
23519 Aug
7924 Aug
207
6.9K30 Aug
4.5K
14731 Aug
1252 Sep
1415 Sep
2.8K7 Sep
4.6K8 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.93%17 Aug
0.90%
1.01%
1.19%18 Aug
0.43%19 Aug
0.00%24 Aug
0.00%
0.25%30 Aug
1.41%
0.68%31 Aug
0.80%2 Sep
1.42%5 Sep
0.67%7 Sep
1.03%8 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.98%.

What the audience does

Likes67.7%287 in total
Reposts6.6%28 in total
Replies12.7%54 in total
Bookmarks13.0%55 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts