tweetindex
EN

US Freedom Flyers

@USFreedomFlyers · joined 14 Feb 2022

At US Freedom Flyers, we stand for medical freedom for all airline passengers and personnel. JOIN US IN THE FIGHT AGAINST ILLEGAL MANDATES.

13 175Followers
3 083Following
16 260Posts total
29.2KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

@USFreedomFlyers Going to Oshkosh 2026? 17 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Article translated to English: https://t.co/paQ4F15iry 278 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
What actions or positions have civil aviation authorities taken on this important safety issue, especially in light of the fact that flight crews were deceived by them? @icao @EASA @FAANews @ECACceac @USFreedomFlyers @JoshYoder @Danilo50306 @IFALPA @eu_cockpit @NTSB Suddenly 373 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
1/3 Captain Saliba of American Airlines, who was put on leave over standing up for his right to not wear a mask, is continuing to fight the good fight over Covid policies. He writes: 202 views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
They’re trying to pretend this never happened. 178 views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Thank you for raising this question. Many pilots felt coerced, and many were injured from the injections. Yet ALPA blocked us early in the rollout and continues to ignore the issue. Loss of confidence in our unions continues. 220 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@ALPAPresident Excellent message, Captain! I completely agree — commercial flights need two duly qualified, certified and competent flight crew members. But since you rightly pointed out Human Factors: why was ALPA (or the FAA, ICAO, EASA) okay with experimental injections (nei 341 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@USFreedomFlyers Does a forum for affected pilots exist? 114 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
US Freedom Flyers does not provide medical, legal, or other professional advice. Our posts are for informational and educational purposes only. Anyone seeking medical or legal advice should consult a professional. 27.5K views · 116 likes · 24 reposts · 23 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

1 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. reaches fewer people than peers, but engages them much harder.

Median views17this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %0.13%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %5.88%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post179240.02×
Reach (views ÷ followers)0.13%3.62%0.04×
Engagement rate5.88%1.52%3.87×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

27.5K28 Feb
11417 May
34121 Dec
22028 Dec
17826 Jan
20219 May
37321 May
278
1715 Jul

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.61%28 Feb
2.63%17 May
1.17%21 Dec
1.36%28 Dec
2.81%26 Jan
3.47%19 May
1.34%21 May
1.08%
5.88%15 Jul

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes64.7%132 in total
Reposts14.7%30 in total
Replies14.7%30 in total
Quotes2.9%6 in total
Bookmarks2.9%6 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts